Medical Malpractice Reform
As the government continues its debate on health care reform, there’s another debate that’s running simultaneously. That debate includes whether or not medical malpractice suits need reform. According to Fox News, there are already special courts that exist where bankruptcies, worker’s compensation cases and tax cases are handled by attorneys specializing in these areas. A. Harrison Barnes, attorney and founder of LawCrossing.com says the high number of physicians opting to err on the side of caution are on the rise. Further, Barnes reiterates the long held belief that cancer misdiagnoses are the most successful malpractice suits.
Malpractice lawyers work to ensure the rights of their clients who have suffered the consequences of wrong diagnoses. Most agree the both the medical and legal fields would benefit from a nationwide malpractice court system. It appears, however, the Obama Administration, along with many Democrats, are vehemently opposed to such a system. But what, if anything, would be the advantage for the average Joe Taxpayer? A. Harrison Barnes says the most significant advantage would be the almost sure reduction in health care costs. It’s not only the LawCrossing.com founder, however, that believes the benefits are many. The Congressional Budget Office calls the potential savings “huge”. Many analysts have even said more than $50 million could be saved over the next ten years in medical tort reforms. Health care costs lowered, lower malpractice insurance premiums for doctors and hospitals and savings to insurance companies since many physicians would no longer feel as though they had to order the whole realm of tests in their efforts of avoiding lawsuits: the justifications become clear.
These changes are long overdue; so what’s the problem? No one’s quite sure, but President Obama has mentioned in recent days his willingness to sit down with Republicans to discuss the options. The fact is, these changes should occur sooner rather than later. As we near the proverbial breaking point, and with all signs pointing to a health care reform that only suggests a shaky foundation, unless something happens soon, we’re all in for less than quality healthcare – worse than it already is.
So what advice does A. Harrison Barnes have for those contemplating new challenges in their legal careers? With the potential to forever change the way healthcare is administered in this country, this particular specialty promises to present challenges and rewards for those wishing to make a difference. As far as those closest to the reform measures agree the time has come.
It’s important to realize the Medicare program would benefit greatly from medical malpractice reform. Finally, those supporters of the reform measures are quick to point out the goal is not to protect those medical personnel who practice irresponsibly or illegally; and in fact, is intended to highlight those who jeopardize their patients’ lives to ensure they’re held accountable. The true goal of the reform is to guarantee medical treatment is made available to every American and to provide doctors the freedoms to practice medicine with fewer reservations with the decisions they make.